Why does Nehemiah repeat the list from Ezra 2?
He found the register of the first return when he enrolled the people, and he included it to establish the community's identity and legitimacy. The repetition links his work to the earlier return.
Why does Nehemiah repeat the list from Ezra 2? Study Nehemiah 7 with context, apologetic analysis, and cross-references.
Dr. Lucas D. Shallua Commentary · NEHEMIAH 7 — GUARDING THE CITY AND THE REGISTER OF THE FIRST RETURNEES
He found the register of the first return when he enrolled the people, and he included it to establish the community's identity and legitimacy. The repetition links his work to the earlier return.
Possible explanations include scribal errors, different copies, or different times of compilation. The totals agree, and the discrepancies do not affect the main message.
In the original register, it was Zerubbabel. In Nehemiah's record, the title may be applied to Nehemiah himself, or it is retained from the source.
Chapter 7 reproduces, with differences, the list of the first returnees found in Ezra 2. Nehemiah explains that he found this list in the course of a registration, when the wall was complete and he needed to repopulate the city. The differences between the two lists, mainly in some numbers and names, are small and have several possible explanations: different copies of the same list, scribal errors in transmitting numerals, or different dates of compilation. The totals agree at 42,360. The chapter has two functions. First, it provides an official record of the families who belonged to the community, which was needed to establish who had rights to land and office, and who should live in the city. Second, it connects Nehemiah's work to the earlier return, showing continuity. The chapter ends with the gifts for the work and the settlement in the towns, preparing for the great assembly in the seventh month, which begins in chapter 8.
The close parallel between Ezra 2 and Nehemiah 7 is a feature that has been discussed by scholars. The differences are of the kind found in other ancient texts copied independently, especially in numerals. The Dead Sea Scrolls show that ancient scribes used various systems for writing numbers, which made errors likely. The structure of the list, with leaders, laymen by family and by town, priests, Levites, singers, gatekeepers, temple servants, and Solomon's servants, matches administrative documents from the ancient Near East. The names fit the Persian period, and many occur in other contemporary documents, such as the Elephantine papyri. The gold daric was introduced by Darius I, which confirms that the register's gift lists date from the Persian period. The mention of a governor who defers the decision about priests to a future use of the Urim and Thummim is consistent with the community's loss of the priestly oracle after the exile.
This study preserves the hard questions, explanations, context, apologetic note, and references from Dr. Shallua's Commentary.