NEHEMIAH 6 — PLOTS AGAINST NEHEMIAH AND THE COMPLETION OF THE WALL IN FIFTY-TWO DAYS

Why did Nehemiah refuse to enter the temple? Study Nehemiah 6 with context, apologetic analysis, and cross-references.

Nehemiah 64 questions
Source linked
Commentary provenance

Dr. Lucas D. Shallua Commentary · NEHEMIAH 6 — PLOTS AGAINST NEHEMIAH AND THE COMPLETION OF THE WALL IN FIFTY-TWO DAYS

01

The precise difficulties

02

Verse and question study

Why did Nehemiah refuse to enter the temple?

As a layman, he was not permitted to enter the sanctuary. Entering would have been a violation of the law. It would also have shown cowardice.

How did Nehemiah know that Shemaiah was a false prophet?

He understood that the message contradicted God's law and that Shemaiah had been hired. He tested the message against Scripture and examined the motive.

Was it possible to rebuild the wall in fifty-two days?

The project involved many workers dividing the wall into sections, and parts of the wall were repairs of existing structures. The speed is remarkable, and the text credits God's help.

Why are women prophets mentioned negatively here?

The text names a prophetess, Noadiah, who was part of the conspiracy. Her gender is not the issue; her false prophecy is. Other passages honor true prophetesses.

03

Historical and literary context

Chapter 6 shows the opposition changing tactics from open hostility to personal attacks designed to remove or discredit Nehemiah. The four attempts are an invitation to a meeting that was a trap, an open letter spreading a false accusation, a false prophecy intended to make him violate the law and act out of fear, and the infiltration of the Jewish nobility by Tobiah's allies. The chapter ends with the completion of the wall on 25 Elul, which corresponds to about October 2, 445 BC. The wall's construction in fifty-two days is a remarkable achievement. The chapter highlights Nehemiah's discernment, resolve, and focus. It also shows that internal compromise, in the form of the nobles' loyalty to Tobiah, was a continuing problem that would resurface in chapter 13.

04

Apologetic note

The date of the completion, 25 Elul in the twentieth year of Artaxerxes, corresponds to early October 445 BC in the Julian calendar. Archaeological excavations in the City of David have uncovered stretches of a wall built quickly with small stones, in contrast to the carefully dressed stones of earlier periods, which fits a hasty construction. The plain of Ono is a known location, and the place name Hakkephirim may be the same as Kephirim in the area. Sanballat's name appears in the Elephantine papyri, which show that the governors of Samaria and Judah were in contact. The Tobiads were a prominent family in Ammon, and the name appears on inscriptions at Iraq el-Amir, where a family of that name built a palace in the Hellenistic period. The existence of a prophetess named Noadiah is unique, but female prophets are attested in the Bible and in other Near Eastern sources. The Persian provincial administration is consistent with the account.

05

Chapter cross-references

06

Source and editorial status

Dr. Shallua’s Commentary

This study preserves the hard questions, explanations, context, apologetic note, and references from Dr. Shallua's Commentary.