Matthew 27

Did Judas repent? Study Matthew 27 with context, apologetic analysis, and cross-references.

Matthew 277 questions
Source linked
Commentary provenance

Dr. Lucas D. Shallua Commentary · Matthew 27

01

The precise difficulties

02

Verse and question study

Did Judas repent?

Judas felt remorse, but his remorse did not lead to repentance. The Greek word metamelomai describes regret or sorrow over consequences. It is not metanoia, the change of mind and direction that leads to salvation. Judas confessed his sin but did not turn to God. He despaired and took his own life. Peter also denied Jesus, but Peter wept bitterly and was restored. The difference is not the severity of the sin but the direction of the heart. Judas turned inward to despair; Peter turned to God in repentance.

Was Pilate responsible for Jesus' death?

Yes. Pilate had the authority to release Jesus. He knew Jesus was innocent. His wife warned him. He publicly declared his own innocence. But he was afraid of the crowd, and he delivered Jesus to be crucified. Washing his hands did not wash away his guilt. The chief priests and the crowd were also responsible. But ultimately, the cross was the plan of God. Acts 2:23 says Jesus was delivered up according to the definite plan and foreknowledge of God. Human guilt and divine sovereignty meet at the cross.

What does "His blood be on us and on our children" mean?

The crowd was accepting responsibility for Jesus' death. It was a self-pronounced curse. The generation that rejected Jesus bore the judgment of AD 70, when Jerusalem was destroyed. But this is not a perpetual curse on the Jewish people. Jesus wept over Jerusalem and longed to gather her children. Paul affirms that God has not rejected His people. The gospel remains for Israel, and there will be a future restoration. The verse has been tragically misused to justify anti-Semitism, which is a sin against God and against His chosen people.

Why did Jesus cry out, "My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?"

Jesus was quoting Psalm 22:1, a lament that expresses the anguish of abandonment. On the cross, He experienced the separation from the Father that sin brings. This does not mean the Father stopped loving Him; it means that Jesus, bearing the sin of the world, experienced the relational distance that sin creates. It is the mystery of the atonement. The sinless One became sin for us, and in that moment, He felt the abandonment that we deserved.

What does the tearing of the temple curtain signify?

The curtain separated the Holy Place from the Most Holy Place. Only the high priest could enter the Most Holy Place, and only once a year on the Day of Atonement. The tearing from top to bottom signifies that the barrier between God and humanity is removed. Through the death of Christ, all believers have access to the Father. The way is open. The direction of the tear shows that God did it, not human hands.

Who were the saints who were raised?

Matthew records that the tombs were opened and many bodies of the saints who had fallen asleep were raised. After Jesus' resurrection, they came out of the tombs and appeared to many in the holy city. This is a foretaste of the general resurrection. It is a sign that the death of Christ has broken the power of the grave. The full harvest will come at the return of Christ, but the firstfruits are a promise that the dead in Christ will rise.

Was Jesus really dead?

Yes. The Romans were experts at execution. They confirmed His death with a spear. Joseph of Arimathea received the body. He was wrapped in linen, placed in a tomb, and sealed with a stone. The women watched. The guard was posted. The burial is a historical fact. The death is certain. But so is the resurrection.

03

Historical and literary context

Chapter 26 ended with Peter's threefold denial and the rooster's crow. Jesus has been condemned by the Sanhedrin as deserving death. Now He is brought before the Roman governor, Pontius Pilate. The Sanhedrin could pronounce a death sentence, but they could not carry it out without Roman approval. So Jesus is delivered to the Gentiles — exactly as He predicted in Matthew 20:19. The chapter moves from the governor's palace to the Praetorium to Golgotha to a borrowed tomb. Every scene drips with irony. The King of the Jews is crowned with thorns. The Son of God is mocked as He saves others. The temple curtain is torn as the temple's true purpose is fulfilled. The first person to fully confess Jesus as the Son of God in Matthew's Gospel is not a disciple but a Gentile soldier. The chapter is a masterclass in theological irony. Matthew continues to show that the King's path to glory runs through suffering.

04

Apologetic note

Some critics argue that Jesus did not actually die on the cross but merely swooned and was later revived. This is impossible for several reasons. First, Roman soldiers were professionals. They knew how to execute. They confirmed Jesus' death with a spear thrust to the side. Second, the amount of blood and water that flowed from the wound indicates a fatal rupture. Third, Jesus had been scourged, which was often fatal in itself. Fourth, He was wrapped in linen and buried with a large stone sealing the tomb. If He had merely swooned, He would have suffocated in the tomb. Fifth, the disciples were not expecting a resurrection; they were hiding in fear. The most plausible explanation for the empty tomb and the disciples' transformation is that Jesus actually rose from the dead. The account of the guard at the tomb is also historically significant. Matthew alone records the sealing of the stone and the posting of the guard. This is a mark of authenticity. If the early church were inventing the story, they would not have included a detail that could be easily checked. The guard is a witness to the fact that the tomb was secured. The empty tomb cannot be explained by theft or trickery. The enemies of the gospel provide the strongest evidence for the resurrection. The crucifixion and burial accounts are deeply rooted in historical detail: the names of Simon of Cyrene, Joseph of Arimathea, the specific women witnesses, the Roman practice of crucifixion, the darkness, the tearing of the curtain. These are not legendary embellishments. They are eyewitness memory. The most plausible explanation for these accounts is that they preserve genuine historical events.

05

Chapter cross-references

06

Source and editorial status

Dr. Shallua’s Commentary

This study preserves the hard questions, explanations, context, apologetic note, and references from Dr. Shallua's Commentary.