SONG OF SONGS 6 — REFOUND BELONGING AND THE UNIQUENESS OF THE BELOVED

Does the Song approve Solomon's many wives and concubines? Study Song of Songs 6 with context, apologetic analysis, and cross-references.

Song of Songs 64 questions
Source linked
Commentary provenance

Dr. Lucas D. Shallua Commentary · SONG OF SONGS 6 — REFOUND BELONGING AND THE UNIQUENESS OF THE BELOVED

01

The precise difficulties

02

Verse and question study

Does the Song approve Solomon's many wives and concubines?

The women may be part of a comparative royal scene rather than the lover's household. If Solomon's harem is intended, the unique beloved contrasts with and implicitly critiques quantity without mutual exclusivity.

Why repeat the same body comparisons from chapter 4?

Repetition creates reassurance and continuity. Familiar words can carry renewed significance after absence and tension.

What happened in the chariot verse?

The Hebrew is obscure, and proposed translations differ too widely for certainty. The safest reading acknowledges sudden movement or exaltation connected with desire and the orchard visit.

Who is the Shulammite?

She is the central woman, but the title's origin is uncertain. Shunem, Shulem, relation to Solomon's name, and “peaceful one” have all been proposed.

03

Historical and literary context

The transition from chapter 5 is emotional rather than fully narrated. The beloved's garden may be literal, erotic, or both; the woman now knows where he belongs despite the previous search. References to sixty queens, eighty concubines, and innumerable maidens may evoke Solomon's court, provide a conventional scale of comparison, or critique royal accumulation by emphasizing one chosen woman. The poem does not clearly state that the male lover possesses this harem.

04

Apologetic note

The chapter preserves textual difficulty rather than smoothing every line into an obvious story, which is typical of ancient lyric poetry and manuscript transmission. Honest uncertainty about verse 12 and the Shulammite title is more faithful than allegorical confidence. The contrast between one beloved and a royal multitude also gives the poem ethical depth within a culture familiar with elite polygyny.

05

Chapter cross-references

06

Source and editorial status

Dr. Shallua’s Commentary

This study preserves the hard questions, explanations, context, apologetic note, and references from Dr. Shallua's Commentary.