NAHUM 2 — THE ATTACK ON NINEVEH AND THE LION'S DEN LAID WASTE
Did Nahum write this before or after the fall of Nineveh? Study Nahum 2 with context, apologetic analysis, and cross-references.
Nahum 25 questions
Source linked
Commentary provenance
Dr. Lucas D. Shallua Commentary · NAHUM 2 — THE ATTACK ON NINEVEH AND THE LION'S DEN LAID WASTE
01
The precise difficulties
Did Nahum write this before or after the fall of Nineveh?
What does "the gates of the rivers are opened" mean?
Who is the queen who is stripped and carried off?
Why does God say, "I am against you"?
Does this chapter mean that God takes sides in wars?
02
Verse and question study
Did Nahum write this before or after the fall of Nineveh?
The book is presented as a prophecy of the city's destruction, and this commentary views it as a genuine prediction delivered before the event. Some critical scholars date the poem to the time of the siege or shortly after it, and others argue for a date after the fall, but the traditional and conservative position is a date before 612 BC, after the fall of Thebes in 663 BC. The poem's vividness is explained by inspiration, and the theological message is the same either way.
What does "the gates of the rivers are opened" mean?
It most likely refers to the water gates or sluices in the city's defenses, and perhaps to a flooding of the Tigris and its tributaries that broke down part of the wall. Ancient writers later report a flood, though these sources are not contemporary. The Babylonian Chronicle does not mention it, and the prophecy is not dependent on a specific mechanism. The point is that the city's defenses failed.
Who is the queen who is stripped and carried off?
Interpreters differ. The most likely options are the personified city of Nineveh, the queen of Assyria, or an image of the goddess. In any case, the verse shows the humiliation of the city and its people, and the text does not require a specific identification.
Why does God say, "I am against you"?
Because Nineveh had become a symbol of ruthless power and violence. The prophets teach that God holds nations responsible for how they treat others, and that He is the defender of the oppressed. This is not hatred of a people but justice against a system that used violence and plunder as a way of life.
Does this chapter mean that God takes sides in wars?
The prophets describe specific historical judgments, in which God used the Babylonians and the Medes to bring down an oppressor. This does not mean that every war is a divinely approved campaign or that one nation can claim God's backing simply because it opposes another. God also judged Babylon and Judah for their sins. Believers should be cautious about claiming divine endorsement for any political or military movement.
03
Historical and literary context
Chapter 2 is the first of two chapters that describe the fall of Nineveh in vivid, almost cinematic terms. In Hebrew poetry, the prophet uses short, rapid sentences, vivid verbs, and images of speed, noise, color, and panic, so that the reader experiences the assault as it unfolds. In the Hebrew Bible, chapter 2 begins one verse earlier than in English Bibles (English 1:15 is Hebrew 2:1, so English 2:1 is Hebrew 2:2), and the verse numbers in this chapter differ by one throughout. This commentary follows the English numbering. The siege of Nineveh in 612 BC was carried out by a coalition of Babylonians under Nabopolassar and Medes under Cyaxares, after a period in which Assyria had been weakened by civil war and by revolts in its empire. The Babylonian Chronicle records that the city was taken in the month of Ab after a siege of three months, and that a great slaughter and plunder followed, with the Assyrian king Sin-shar-ishkun apparently dying in the fall of the city (the damaged tablet is not fully clear on this). Some interpreters think that Nahum was describing the fall of the city as a prediction before it occurred, with the vividness resulting from the prophet's inspired vision. Others suggest that the prophet had access to information about military preparations in the region, or that the poem was composed close to the time of the siege. This commentary views the book as a genuine prophecy delivered before the event, and acknowledges that the exact date of composition within the seventh century BC is uncertain. The lion imagery used throughout the chapter reflects the lion as the symbol of Assyrian kingship. Assyrian reliefs depict kings hunting lions as an expression of royal power, and the lion's den is a fitting image of the city itself.
04
Apologetic note
The fall of Nineveh is among the best-documented events of the ancient Near East. The Babylonian Chronicle, a cuneiform tablet in the British Museum, records the campaign of 612 BC, stating that the Medes and Babylonians besieged the city for three months and then took it, inflicting heavy defeat and carrying off its plunder. The damaged tablet appears to indicate that the king of Assyria died in the fighting, and it describes how the Assyrians withdrew to Harran, where a remnant of the army made a last stand until 609 BC. The excavation of Nineveh, in the nineteenth century and later, has shown extensive evidence of destruction by fire in the palaces and temples, along with arrowheads, and bodies found near one of the city gates. The Khosr River and the system of canals constructed by Sennacherib to bring water to the city have also been traced, which confirms that the water system was a key feature of its defenses and a possible weakness. The use of lion imagery in the chapter is closely connected to Assyrian art. The reliefs from the palaces of Ashurbanipal at Nineveh include the famous lion-hunt scenes, in which the king kills lions released from cages. Lion statues and winged lions guarded palace entrances. The prophet's use of the lion as a symbol of Assyrian royal power shows familiarity with the culture of the empire and gives vivid force to the question about the lion's den. The remarkable speed of Assyria's collapse was a surprise to the ancient world: within about twenty years of the death of its last great king, Ashurbanipal, the empire had disappeared. The book's central claim, that a world power that seemed invincible would fall suddenly, is vindicated by the historical record.