JUDE 1 — CONTENDING FOR THE FAITH, JUDGMENT ON THE GODLESS, AND KEPT BY GOD

Why does Jude quote 1 Enoch and the Assumption of Moses? Does that make them Scripture? Study Jude 1 with context, apologetic analysis, and cross-references.

Jude 17 questions
Source linked
Commentary provenance

Dr. Lucas D. Shallua Commentary · JUDE 1 — CONTENDING FOR THE FAITH, JUDGMENT ON THE GODLESS, AND KEPT BY GOD

01

The precise difficulties

02

Verse and question study

Why does Jude quote 1 Enoch and the Assumption of Moses? Does that make them Scripture?

No. Jude cites them as sources that his readers knew, in the way that Paul quoted pagan poets in Acts 17 and Titus 1. A quotation does not endorse the whole book. Jude sees a truth in the statements he cites that is consistent with Scripture. The early church debated whether to accept Jude because of this, and Jerome noted the concern, but the letter was received into the canon. The principle is that God can use any source to communicate a true point, while only Scripture is inspired and authoritative.

Who were the angels who left their dwelling?

Jude refers to angels who rebelled against God and are now in confinement awaiting judgment. Many interpreters connect this with the sons of God in Genesis 6:1–4, as described in Jewish tradition, and others see a reference to the original fall of Satan and his angels. Either way, the point is that angels are not exempt from judgment. Christians differ on the details, and this commentary holds them with humility.

Does the statement that the false teachers were "designated for condemnation" teach predestination to hell?

The word means that their judgment was written about beforehand, in the pattern of Scripture, such as the examples that Jude cites. It does not state that God forced them to sin or that they had no choice. Christians differ on how to understand election and reprobation, and Jude's main concern is that the false teachers are responsible for their rebellion, and that God's judgment on them is certain.

What does "contend for the faith once for all delivered" mean?

It means to defend the apostolic gospel, which was entrusted to the church in complete form. The body of Christian doctrine is not subject to ongoing revision by new revelation or cultural pressure. This does not mean that believers cannot grow in understanding, but that they cannot change the gospel. This also means that prophecy and spiritual experiences today, which this commentary affirms, must be tested by Scripture and cannot add to the faith delivered.

What does it mean to "pray in the Holy Spirit"?

It means to pray under the guidance and empowerment of the Spirit. Paul speaks of the Spirit helping us in weakness and interceding for us (Romans 8:26–27) and of praying in the Spirit at all times (Ephesians 6:18). Many Christians, including those in the Pentecostal and Charismatic traditions, understand this to include praying in tongues, which Paul describes as a Spirit-given gift that edifies the believer (1 Corinthians 14:2, 4, 14–15). This commentary affirms that tongues is a valid and valuable form of Spirit-led prayer, while holding that the phrase is broader and includes all prayer led by the Spirit.

Can Christians "keep themselves" in God's love if God is the one who keeps them?

Jude affirms both. God keeps believers (verses 1, 24), and believers are told to keep themselves in His love (verse 21). These are not contradictory but complementary: God's keeping is the foundation, and the believer's perseverance is the way in which that keeping is experienced. This commentary holds that those who are truly in Christ will be kept to the end, and that their perseverance is the evidence of that keeping.

Is Michael's dispute with the devil over Moses' body a historical event?

The incident is not described in the Old Testament, and Jude seems to draw it from Jewish tradition. Whether Jude regarded it as historical or used it as an illustration is debated. As a statement inspired by the Spirit, it teaches that Michael deferred to God's authority. The point is not the detail of the story, but the principle that spiritual authority is derived from God and exercised with humility.

03

Historical and literary context

Jude is a short, intense letter that sounds an alarm. Its author calls himself Jude (the Greek form of Judah) and identifies himself as a servant of Jesus Christ and a brother of James. The James in question is almost certainly James the leader of the Jerusalem church, and so Jude is one of the brothers of Jesus named in Matthew 13:55 and Mark 6:3. Like James, he did not believe in Jesus during His ministry (John 7:5), but became a believer after the resurrection (Acts 1:14; 1 Corinthians 9:5). The fact that he does not claim to be the Lord's brother but a servant of Jesus Christ reflects humility, in the same way as James. The letter was probably written in the 60s to 80s AD, and its readers were Christians, probably Jewish believers, who were facing a threat from within. The threat is a group of false teachers who have infiltrated the church. Their errors were both moral and doctrinal: they used the doctrine of grace as an excuse for sexual immorality and rebellion against authority, they denied the lordship of Christ, and they were motivated by greed and self-promotion. Jude responds with a sustained warning that draws on examples from the Old Testament and Jewish tradition. Unlike other books, it makes use of two Jewish writings that were not part of the canon, the Assumption of Moses (or a similar tradition) and 1 Enoch. The letter closely parallels 2 Peter 2, and most scholars hold that Peter drew on Jude, though some argue the reverse. It ends with one of the most beloved doxologies in the New Testament. The message is simple: defend the faith, remember the examples of judgment, build yourselves up in the Spirit, keep yourselves in God's love, and rely on the God who keeps you.

04

Apologetic note

The author of Jude is a brother of Jesus, and his presence in the New Testament is part of a striking historical pattern. The Gospels record that Jesus' brothers did not believe in Him during His ministry (John 7:5), and yet after the resurrection, James and Jude became leaders in the early church. This change is best explained by an encounter with the risen Jesus, as Paul reports for James (1 Corinthians 15:7). The tradition recorded by Hegesippus and preserved by Eusebius adds that grandsons of Jude were brought before the emperor Domitian as descendants of David and were released when they were found to be simple farmers with calloused hands, which, if accurate, shows that the family of Jesus remained prominent in the early church. The letter also illustrates the way that the early church used its Jewish background. The citation of 1 Enoch is significant, since fragments of 1 Enoch in Aramaic were found among the Dead Sea Scrolls at Qumran, showing that the book was widely read in Jewish circles in the period. Jude assumes that his readers know these traditions, which fits the Jewish-Christian audience. The letter's relationship to 2 Peter 2 shows that the early church had a shared body of teaching against false teachers, and the existence of two letters with parallel material indicates the seriousness and persistence of the threat. Jude's early reception is supported by external evidence: it is listed in the Muratorian Fragment (late second century), quoted by Tertullian and Clement of Alexandria, and included in the third-century papyrus P72 along with 1 and 2 Peter. Some in the early church hesitated to accept it because of its use of non-canonical writings, as Jerome records, but it was recognized as canonical by the fourth century. The letter's anticipation of scoffers, and its insistence on a faith delivered once for all, is also relevant to the historical emergence of Gnostic movements, which claimed new revelations and denied the lordship of Christ in the second century.

05

Chapter cross-references

06

Source and editorial status

Dr. Shallua’s Commentary

This study preserves the hard questions, explanations, context, apologetic note, and references from Dr. Shallua's Commentary.