HEBREWS 7 — THE PRIESTHOOD OF MELCHIZEDEK FULFILLED IN CHRIST
Was Melchizedek the preincarnate Christ? Study Hebrews 7 with context, apologetic analysis, and cross-references.
Hebrews 75 questions
Source linked
Commentary provenance
Dr. Lucas D. Shallua Commentary · HEBREWS 7 — THE PRIESTHOOD OF MELCHIZEDEK FULFILLED IN CHRIST
01
The precise difficulties
Was Melchizedek the preincarnate Christ?
Does this chapter teach that Christians should tithe?
What does it mean that the law was changed?
Does Christ's intercession mean that He is continually pleading with the Father?
Does verse 25 teach that believers are eternally secure?
02
Verse and question study
Was Melchizedek the preincarnate Christ?
Some have thought so, but the text says that he "resembles" the Son of God, which implies a likeness and not an identity. The author's argument is typological: Melchizedek is a figure in Scripture who points forward to Christ, and the silence of the Genesis narrative about his origin and end serves the purpose of this comparison. Christians have held different views, and this commentary understands Melchizedek as a historical king-priest who served as a type of Christ.
Does this chapter teach that Christians should tithe?
The tithe is mentioned in connection with Abraham and Melchizedek and with the Levitical law. The author's point is about the superiority of Melchizedek, and not about the obligations of Christians. Many Christians see the tithe as a helpful guideline for giving, and in the New Testament the emphasis is on generous and cheerful giving (2 Corinthians 9:6–8). The passage does not command tithing in the church.
What does it mean that the law was changed?
It means that the law of Moses, as a system for approaching God through the Levitical priesthood and sacrifices, has been fulfilled and superseded in Christ. The moral demands of the law are not abolished but are fulfilled in Christ and written on the hearts of believers by the Spirit (Romans 8:3–4). The ceremonial and sacrificial system pointed to Christ and has reached its goal in Him.
Does Christ's intercession mean that He is continually pleading with the Father?
The statement means that Christ continually represents His people before the Father, on the basis of His completed sacrifice. It does not suggest that He has to persuade a reluctant Father or repeat His sacrifice. His very presence at the right hand of God is the permanent testimony of His finished work, and He ensures that nothing can separate His people from God's love (Romans 8:34).
Does verse 25 teach that believers are eternally secure?
It teaches that Christ is able to save completely and for all time those who come to God through Him, because He lives forever to intercede. This is a strong support for eternal security, and it is consistent with the view of this commentary that those who are truly in Christ are kept by Him, and that perseverance is the evidence of genuine faith.
03
Historical and literary context
Chapter 7 is the technical center of the argument of Hebrews. The author has introduced Melchizedek in 5:6, 10 and 6:20, and now he explains why this obscure figure matters. Melchizedek appears in only two places in the Old Testament: in Genesis 14:17–20, where he blesses Abraham after the battle with the kings, and in Psalm 110:4, where God declares that the Davidic king is a priest forever in the order of Melchizedek. The author reads the Genesis account closely, noting what it says and what it leaves out, and he draws conclusions about the superiority of Melchizedek's priesthood over the Levitical priesthood. This method is a form of Jewish scriptural interpretation, and it must be read as typology, in which Melchizedek is a figure who foreshadows Christ, and not as a claim that Melchizedek was literally the preincarnate Christ. The argument has three parts: Melchizedek was greater than Abraham and therefore than Levi (verses 1–10), the Levitical priesthood could not bring perfection, so another priest was needed (verses 11–19), and Christ's priesthood is based on an oath, is permanent, and is perfect (verses 20–28). The chapter shows that the whole system of the old covenant, which was built on the Levitical priesthood, has been superseded by a better priesthood and a better covenant.
04
Apologetic note
Melchizedek is a good example of the way that the New Testament authors read the Old Testament. They paid attention to its details, and they believed that God had planted in the Scriptures patterns and shadows that pointed to Christ. The comparison between Melchizedek and Christ is not an artificial invention but arises from the text of Psalm 110, which is addressed to the Davidic king and promises him a priesthood in the order of Melchizedek. This psalm was understood as messianic in Jewish tradition before and during the time of Jesus, and Jesus Himself appealed to it in His debate with the Pharisees (Mark 12:35–37). The Dead Sea Scrolls provide further background: a text from Qumran (11Q13) portrays Melchizedek as a heavenly figure who will execute judgment at the end of the age and bring liberation to the captives, which shows that Jewish interest in Melchizedek was strong in the period. The author of Hebrews takes a figure who was the subject of speculation and shows that the reality is found in Christ. The argument also shows that Christianity did not arise as a rejection of the Old Testament but as its fulfillment. The author's assumption that his readers understood the Levitical system and the Genesis account indicates that they were well versed in the Scriptures, as were many early Christians. The mention of the oath and the guarantee shows that the early church saw the work of Christ as the fulfillment of God's covenant promises, with legal and personal commitments that cannot fail.