HAGGAI 2 — THE LATTER GLORY, THE UNCLEAN OFFERING, AND THE SIGNET RING

Is the "desire of all nations" a prediction of the Messiah? Study Haggai 2 with context, apologetic analysis, and cross-references.

Haggai 26 questions
Source linked
Commentary provenance

Dr. Lucas D. Shallua Commentary · HAGGAI 2 — THE LATTER GLORY, THE UNCLEAN OFFERING, AND THE SIGNET RING

01

The precise difficulties

02

Verse and question study

Is the "desire of all nations" a prediction of the Messiah?

The Hebrew phrase is better understood as the treasures or desirable things of the nations, since the verb is plural and the following verse speaks of silver and gold. The older reading was influenced by the Vulgate. The Messianic reading is not the main sense of the Hebrew but expresses the outcome: the glory that fills the house is ultimately the glory of Christ. It is wise to avoid building doctrine on this reading, and to rest the Messianic hope of Haggai on the clearer promises in the book.

When was the "latter glory" fulfilled?

Interpreters differ. Some point to the presence of Christ in the second temple, others to the church as the temple of the Spirit, and others to a future temple in the Messianic kingdom, or to the new creation. This commentary holds that the promise is fulfilled primarily in the person of Christ, whose presence makes any temple greater than Solomon's, and that its fullness awaits the age to come.

Does the priests' ruling mean that sin is more powerful than holiness?

In the Law, uncleanness spreads more easily than holiness, and this shows that people cannot cleanse themselves by good works or ritual alone. The ruling is not a statement of cosmic dualism but a teaching about human need. In Christ, the pattern is reversed: when Jesus touched lepers and the dead, He was not defiled, but the unclean were made clean (Mark 1:40–42; 5:41–42).

Why did God promise blessing before the harvest?

The point is that God's favor rests on His faithfulness, not on the results of their labor. The people were asked to trust, and to begin to obey before the evidence of the change appeared. It also shows that the earlier lean years were not final.

Did the promise to Zerubbabel fail?

Zerubbabel did not become king, and the Persian empire continued for another two centuries. The promise is better understood as a pledge that the Davidic line would be preserved and would reach its goal in the Messiah, which Matthew and Luke affirm by including Zerubbabel in the genealogies of Jesus. It is also possible that the fulfillment of the promise in its fullest sense still awaits the final shaking and the reign of Christ.

Does the shaking of the nations refer to events in the ancient world or to the end of the age?

It has both horizons. The prophets often described near events as part of God's larger plan, and the New Testament uses the language of the shaking to speak about the end of the age (Hebrews 12:26–28). The point is that no kingdom of this world is permanent, and that those who belong to Christ receive a kingdom that cannot be shaken.

03

Historical and literary context

Chapter 2 contains three messages. The first (verses 1–9) was given on the twenty-first day of the seventh month, which is the last day of the Feast of Tabernacles (the Feast of Booths), in October 520 BC, about a month after the work began. The people had been building, but the work was modest, and the feast, which celebrated the harvest and recalled the wilderness, would have drawn attention to the gap between what was being built and what had been lost. The second and third messages (verses 10–19 and 20–23) were both given on the twenty-fourth day of the ninth month, December 520 BC, nearly three months after the work began. Solomon's temple, which had been destroyed in 586 BC, had been gold-plated and richly decorated (1 Kings 6–7), and the elderly who had seen it must have looked at the new foundation with mixed feelings (Ezra 3:12–13). Haggai addresses this discouragement directly. The chapter uses images that link this small project to God's purposes for the nations, and the book ends with a promise that looks past the immediate setting. The temple was an important sign of God's presence. In the prophets, the temple's restoration is tied to the coming of the Messianic age (Isaiah 2:2–4; Ezekiel 40–48; Zechariah 6:12–15), and the New Testament uses Haggai 2:6 to describe the final shaking that leaves only the unshakable kingdom of God (Hebrews 12:26–28). The chapter also contains two features that need careful explanation: a priestly ruling about holiness and uncleanness (verses 10–14) and the promise to Zerubbabel (verses 20–23).

04

Apologetic note

The book of Haggai contains a notable amount of historical detail in a very small space, and its four messages fit the Persian-period context. The dates correspond to specific days in the Babylonian-Persian calendar, which was used throughout the empire, and when converted, they fall in August, September, October, and December of 520 BC. The Behistun Inscription and Babylonian records from the reign of Darius I establish the chronology, and the book of Ezra places the completion of the temple on the third day of the month of Adar in Darius's sixth year, around March 515 BC (Ezra 6:15). The close agreement between a short prophetic book and a larger historical work, each dated by the Persian royal calendar, supports the claim that these books record real events. Haggai's use of the ritual law is also consistent with the Torah's categories of holiness and uncleanness. The principle that holiness could pass to objects by direct contact but not by indirect contact, and that uncleanness could spread more widely, matches the law in Leviticus and Numbers, and it indicates that the community in the sixth century BC understood and applied the Pentateuch. The prophecy that the nations' power would be broken has also been repeatedly confirmed in the history of ancient empires: Persia fell to Alexander in the fourth century BC, and Alexander's empire was divided and later absorbed by Rome. The prophet's emphasis on the Davidic line was affirmed by the early Christian community, which preserved the genealogies in Matthew and Luke that list Zerubbabel, and these genealogies were presented in a society that valued the descent of the Messiah from David.

05

Chapter cross-references

06

Source and editorial status

Dr. Shallua’s Commentary

This study preserves the hard questions, explanations, context, apologetic note, and references from Dr. Shallua's Commentary.