DANIEL 1 — FAITHFULNESS IN BABYLON AND WISDOM GIVEN BY GOD

Does Daniel 1 contradict Jeremiah's chronology? Study Daniel 1 with context, apologetic analysis, and cross-references.

Daniel 13 questions
Source linked
Commentary provenance

Dr. Lucas D. Shallua Commentary · DANIEL 1 — FAITHFULNESS IN BABYLON AND WISDOM GIVEN BY GOD

01

The precise difficulties

02

Verse and question study

Does Daniel 1 contradict Jeremiah's chronology?

Babylonian accession-year reckoning and Judean non-accession reckoning can number the same period differently. Daniel's “third year” and Jeremiah's “fourth year” are compatible under known ancient systems.

Why was the food defiling?

The text does not specify. Purity laws, idol association, preparation, and symbolic dependence are plausible. The commentary should not turn the episode into a rule requiring vegetarianism.

Was it wrong to receive pagan names and education?

The youths could not control the names imposed on them, and they learned foreign literature without worshiping foreign gods. Scripture distinguishes cultural learning from religious allegiance.

03

Historical and literary context

Daniel identifies himself as a Judean exile taken to Babylon during Nebuchadnezzar's reign. The first deportation is associated with 605 BC, after Babylon defeated Egypt at Carchemish and asserted control over Judah. Daniel served through successive Babylonian and Persian administrations into the reign of Cyrus. The book combines court narratives in chapters 1–6 with Daniel's visions in chapters 7–12. The book uses two languages. Daniel 1:1–2:4a and chapters 8–12 are in Hebrew; 2:4b–7:28 is in Aramaic, the international language of much of the ancient Near East. The Aramaic section forms a literary unit centered on God's rule over Gentile kingdoms. The shift is intentional and does not require multiple unrelated books. This commentary favors a sixth-century setting and Daniel's essential authorship, as the book presents and as Jesus' reference to “Daniel the prophet” supports (Matthew 24:15). A common critical view dates the final form to the second century BC during Antiochus IV Epiphanes, arguing that chapter 11 describes events up to that period with unusual precision and that the book belongs to later apocalyptic literature. The sixth-century view responds that predictive prophecy is intrinsic to the book, that its Babylonian and Persian court details are substantial, and that early manuscript evidence presupposes an already respected work. Some historical and linguistic questions remain debated, and responsible defense should not overstate evidence. Daniel in the Protestant canon contains twelve chapters. Greek versions preserve additional stories and prayers—The Prayer of Azariah, Song of the Three, Susanna, and Bel and the Dragon—received as deuterocanonical by some traditions. This commentary follows the Hebrew-Aramaic form reflected in the Protestant Old Testament while treating other traditions respectfully.

04

Apologetic note

Babylonian policy commonly relocated elite youths and trained administrators from conquered peoples. Daniel's setting therefore fits known imperial practice. The chapter also preserves Babylonian concerns with court sages and omen literature while consistently locating true revelation in Israel's God.

05

Chapter cross-references

06

Source and editorial status

Dr. Shallua’s Commentary

This study preserves the hard questions, explanations, context, apologetic note, and references from Dr. Shallua's Commentary.