1 CORINTHIANS 5 — PURITY AND DISCIPLINE IN THE CHURCH

Does "deliver to Satan" mean the man lost his salvation? Study 1 Corinthians 5 with context, apologetic analysis, and cross-references.

1 Corinthians 54 questions
Source linked
Commentary provenance

Dr. Lucas D. Shallua Commentary · 1 CORINTHIANS 5 — PURITY AND DISCIPLINE IN THE CHURCH

01

The precise difficulties

02

Verse and question study

Does "deliver to Satan" mean the man lost his salvation?

No. Paul's stated goal is that "his spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord." Discipline is redemptive, and the verse assumes that the man is a believer who is in danger of being lost to sin's power but who may be restored. The Bible teaches that those truly in Christ are kept by God (John 10:27–29; Romans 8:38–39), but it also teaches that persistent unrepentant sin calls a person's profession into question. The church is to act, trusting God to complete the work.

Was the man restored after discipline?

We are not told in this letter. Many interpreters connect 2 Corinthians 2:5–11 with this case, where Paul urges the church to forgive and comfort a person who had been punished by the majority, but the text does not name the offender, and other scholars think a different incident is in view. Either way, the goal of discipline is always restoration, and repentant people must be received back with love.

Does this passage mean the church should avoid all sinners?

No. Paul explicitly says that is not what he meant. The church is to remain in contact with unbelievers and to share the gospel with them. The discipline is for professing believers who persist in sin without repentance.

What does "not even to eat with such a one" mean today?

In the ancient world, a meal expressed fellowship and acceptance, and so refusing a shared meal communicated that the person could not be treated as a member in good standing. It likely includes the Lord's Supper and close fellowship, but it does not forbid every contact, since the offender may still hear the gospel and be urged to repent (compare 2 Thessalonians 3:14–15). The attitude of the church should be sorrow and love, not hostility.

03

Historical and literary context

Having dealt with the church's divisions, Paul turns to a case of sexual immorality reported to him, probably by the same sources as before. A man was living with "his father's wife," almost certainly his stepmother, since the phrase avoids the word "mother" (Leviticus 18:8 and Deuteronomy 22:30 forbid it). The father may have been still living or divorced or dead; the text does not say. The church had done nothing, and even seemed proud. Some scholars suggest that the church's pride came from a distorted idea of grace or spiritual freedom, or from the patronage of a socially prominent man, whom the church was reluctant to offend. Paul's response is firm and structured: he declares his judgment, instructs the church to act, and grounds the command in the image of Passover. The passage is the New Testament's most extended teaching on church discipline, and it must be read together with 2 Corinthians 2:5–11 and 7:8–12, which many scholars see as describing the aftermath.

04

Apologetic note

The command to discipline an unrepentant member illustrates that early Christianity held its members to a moral standard that was often higher than the surrounding culture's. It is difficult to explain the appeal of the movement if its ethical teaching were simply a rationalization of what people wanted to do. Early Christian writings from outside the New Testament show the same pattern: members were expected to avoid sexual immorality, greed, and violence, and those who did not were disciplined. The "reputation" of the church became a point of pride and of reproach in a society where many people felt the weight of moral confusion. The call for holiness, grounded in the cross, is a major reason Christianity attracted people who wanted more than the moral flexibility of pagan religion.

05

Chapter cross-references

06

Source and editorial status

Dr. Shallua’s Commentary

This study preserves the hard questions, explanations, context, apologetic note, and references from Dr. Shallua's Commentary.